'Critical Evalutation on Pacfic Brands Case Study\r'

'The caution issue, ethical right faecal matter be place when the beau monde pacific Brands had denote that they were closing all septet f practiseories in Australia and moving the manufacturing contrary due to the fact that wear upon would be much cheaper oversea as well as Australians would be paying slight money for the same clothes. This highlights peace-loving Brands action to take the company oversea, being negative opinion of ethical responsibility. This selfish act would give the business a bad name/reputation.A multinational company may chance on its manufacturing facility to a underdeveloped country to reduce costs. Practices unexceptionable in that country, such as child labor, poor wellness and safety, poverty-level wages and coerced employment, will not be tolerated by an ethical company (Lynn MacDonald, 2011). Pacific Brands has displayed no duty to follow a morally correct street with the organization in hurt of ethical responsibility. Although It can be argued that this action to move overseas would increase employment opportunities overseas.Another management Issue hat can be seen by Pacific Brands Is corporate genial responsibility. The world Image displayed Is not actually positive as It was patent Pacific Brands portrayed no sense of care for the stream 1850 employees that had been working for the company. The company Is straightway seen as a foreign organization displaying the disadvantages of corporate social responsibility. This Is also not frank for the Australian economy as the manufacturing Is done over seas for cheaper labor. Pacific Brands has not embraced responsibility for the companys actions and progress a positive rival through their employees.\r\n'