'Human behavior theories Essay\r'

'Working as a familiarity facilitator is all ab come out empowering and facilitating change indoors individuals and communities. As their practice facilitators consume to identify whatever challenges and become with the communities to look at centerings of solving these problems together. This therefore(prenominal) requires first for the facilitator to find out why these challenges or problems come about in the first describe. Theories atomic number 18 designed to under(a)stand human developwork forcet, personal identity and cominges to practice. They assistance free rein complicated human, conductal and accessible singularities into ideas that ar more(prenominal) accessible.\r\nIt terminate be said then that theories provide a basis for mind and reflecting on what we do which then encourages us help communities on a micro, mezzo and macro levels. This essay entrust look at devil of the human behaviour theories and how they help us understand and work with our communities (that we as facilitators serve) better. 2. DEFINITION OF TERMS 2. 1. Theory According to (Body, 2014) â€Å"A guess is a logical system of concepts that helps to rationalize why some(a)thing happens in a particular course and to predict outcomes”.\r\nThis miserlys that by preparing their practice on theory, this leads a facilitator to get a better experience of his/her own task, do some goal formulation and likewise anticipate whatever outcomes there may be. 2. 2. Community Communities atomic number 18 unique with regard to the plurality in them, place, int epochction meaning. According to (Heaven, 2014) â€Å"While we traditionally think of a lodge as the bulk in a given geographical location, the expression can really refer to every host sharing something in common”. This could similarly mean any small geographical aras from e. g. a neighbourhood, caparison project or growing to any confederacy of come tos with a large geographicall y-defined community. 3. HUMAN BEHAVIOR THEORIESÃ'Ž\r\n3. 1. kind Construction br differently mental synthesis is influential in changing grounded theory. As a government agency of act to understand the companionable world, tender turn watchs friendship as being 2 designed (as the name suggests) kinda of being arrive atd. In this theory communities ar seen as alternating betwixt both(prenominal) subjective and accusatory worldly concern. Past theorists believed that knowledge is beliefs in which muckle turn in rational confidence, a common sense of understanding and consensual nonion as to what is knowledge. Social construction came about as a way to regard with the nature of cosmos.\r\nIt has its origins in sociology and has been linked with the modern era of qualitative research. Reality is it may be something that we argon not even aware of. Things like separatism according to what sex, race and class you are a just basic examples of neighborly constructi on. These things just now stool meaning because monastic order gives them meaning. According to Tom Andrews (2014) â€Å"Constructionists view knowledge and truth as created not spy by the mind and supports the view that being a realist is not inconsistent with being a constructionist”.\r\nA person can believe that concepts are constructed other than being discovered yet relate to something in the real world. This is consistent with an idea that was put out that truth is socially defined but this cardinal referred to the subjective experience of workaday life as opposed to the quarry reality of the natural world.\r\nAs Steedman (2000) said, â€Å"most of what is known and most of the knowing that is through with(p) is concerned with trying to distinguish sense of what it is to be human, as opposed to scientific knowledge”. Individuals or communities decide or rather create this reality cardinal may then ask how this reality or knowledge emerges or how it co mes to use up import for rules of order to which social constructionists may answer as they view knowledge as being created by the interactions of individuals within society which is at the pore of social construction as a theory.\r\nAndrews (2014) believes that subjective reality is brought about by the interaction of people with their social world and with this social world influencing them it results to routines and habits. That is to say that any regularly repeated action becomes a radiation pattern which at some point can be do without much effort needed. With time this forms a sort of store of knowledge which is passed on to emerging generations which is then subjective reality. 3 night club gives you and identity from birth.\r\nOur identities as people come not from the internal but from the social sphere. Conversation is the main way of maintaining, modifying and reconstructing subjective reality. It compromises notions that are shared unproblematically between the communities so much so that these notions need not be defined each time they are use in conversation and come to assume reality. 3. 2. Examples of Social Construction The most common of all social constructions is that of men and women.\r\nMen are required (by society) to go through qualities such as control, efficiency, toughness and coolness under emotional distress whilst women on the other achieve are said to be the fragile amongst the two with qualities such as inefficiency, emotional expressiveness, caring and mutuality. This is what society has deemed as normal over the years which is what gives the competitiveness of Patriarchy versus Matriarchy in this modern generation. Women like a shot believe that they are more than able to do whatever the â€Å"men” can do and sometimes do it even better. It is clear though that in society’s opinion of gender that men should hold all the power.\r\nLaura\r\nFlores (2012) is quoted as saying â€Å" strength looks sexy on men, not on women”. barely this could be seen as having a double meaning. other(a) than the obvious meaning we get, it could besides mean that women are seen as otiose to learn the skills or unable to do whatever a man can do as well. Feminists have been fighting unexpressed battles in order to change this thinking and they have succeeded in changing some people’s minds but the in the traditional societies, mostly in the rural areas this social construction of men and women is hitherto very much evident.\r\nMen still go out to provide for the family while the women is expected to stop consonant behind and take care of the children and the home. One other example hotshot could use is that of the social construction of gender. This is slightly different from the previous example used. When a baby is brought into the world the first thing that the get will look at is the baby’s sexual category (whether they are male or female) and this is where this soc ial construction begins. Immediately after they are classified as boy or young lady the parents then fall into this shared mechanism by bandaging them in colours that are â€Å"admit” for their gender.\r\nFlores says â€Å"the â€Å"normal” thing to do in this look would be for the 4 baby girl to be dressed in pink and the baby boys to be dressed in blue”. You don’t want to be seen as weird for dressing your baby girl in blue or your baby boy in pink, right? Society has put aside colours as some of the symbols that differentiate between boys and girls. Children will then stir like this and then start to try to be like the people who are the same gender as them, â€Å"girls should start acting like their mom and boys act like their daddy”. Each one will be expected to dress or act in a certain way (as in the first example) but such things are what leads to stereotypes.\r\n3. 3. summation establish Community Approach 3. 3. 1. What is Asset Base d Community Approach (ABCD)? Asset Based Community Development (ABCD) is an approach for sustainable community development. The basis of ABCD is that it believes that communities can develop themselves by recognizing and development existing but often hidden assets to create economic opportunities. It builds those already existing assets in the community and gets individuals, associations and institutions to band together to build on their assets instead of focusing on their needs. It is a naturally supreme approach.\r\nA large amount of time is worn-out(a) in trying to identify the assets within a particular community whether it be from individuals, institutions and associations before they are then organised to build on them to the eudaemonia of the community as a whole. The basic delineate as mentioned above is to use what is already in the community. The ABC approach aims to change people’s view that their needs can only be met by an outsider (professional). When it comes to working with the community, a facilitator who applies the ABCD approach should be adamant about stepping back and permit the community figure things out for themselves.\r\nThey enlist the help of associations that are within the community in wrong of the community development approach and additional support. moreover Community driven development is mostly done by outside agencies instead of networks that exist in the community already. 3. 3. 2. Discussion on ABCD ABCD pulls out the strengths and weaknesses within a community’s shared level as a starting point for change. start of all the assets that a community may 5 have ABCD focuses on the assets that are deep grow in social relationships and sees them as being both evident in both formal and slack networks and associations.\r\nIt believes that everyone in the community has something to offer and that no one can be said to unimportant. ABCD view individuals as being as being at the centre of it all. The res idents of the community has gifts and skills which they can out on the table. These need to be recognized and noted as in community development you can’t do anything with people’s needs but only their assets. Needs are only valuable to institutions. Institutions are groups of people (usually professionals) who share a common interest out of their own choice.\r\nThese could be agencies or schools etcetera these institutions help the community get resources and that in turn gives them a sense of civic responsibility. In terms of assets one could include physical assets such as land, space, funds etc. as they also could be used. 3. 3. 3. How is it facilitated in communities? As mentioned above ABCD is the development of self-mobilisation for change. This development has been implemented in many communities. The task for any agency that comes into a community such as NGO’s is how to put in place this development in other communities without creating a sense of dep endency.\r\nThere are different methods that are facilitated by NGO’s in communities for ABCD. Methods such as Collecting stories whereby they build confidence, informal discussions and interview that also have the goal of drawing out people’s experiences. Success in this will also enable them to uncover any gifts, skills, talents and assets that people in the community may have. occasion the capacities and assets of individuals, associations and local institutions. Mapping is more than just gathering data on the community.\r\nIt is of importance that you let the community and institutions d the social occasion for themselves as they build new relationships, learn more about help and talents of other community members and also see any connections between different assets. 6 CONCLUSION Understanding a community is life-or-death to being able to work in it. failing to understand it will deny you credibility and make it difficult for you both to connect with community members and to bring off the twists and turns of starting and implementing a community initiative or intervention. Social constructionism places great emphasis on everyday interactions between people and how they use language to construct their reality.\r\nIt regards the social practices people engage in as the focus of enquiry.\r\nThis is very similar to the focus of grounded theory but without the emphasis on language. Social constructionism that views society as existing both as objective and subjective reality is fully compatible with classical grounded theory, unlike constructionist grounded theory which takes a relativist position. The ABCD is a replacing the more known needs-based approach. Instead of focusing on what the communities do not have, ABCD looks at what they have to offer. It not only creates a chance for the community to tour a part in but they also lead the community planning process.\r\nThe ABCD is always prosperous in getting individual participation in the projects in brings to their communities. 7 REFERENCE LIST Andrews, T (2012). What is social constructionism? [ONLINE] gettable at: http://groundedtheoryreview. com/2012/06/01/what-is-social-constructionism/ . [Last Accessed 26 dire 2014]. Body, A. (n. d. ). Theories utilise in Social Work Practice. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www. socialworkdegree. net/theories-used-in-social-work-practice/ . [Last Accessed 26 August 2014]. Cunningham, G and Mathie, A. (2002).\r\nAsset Based Community Development- An Overview. [ONLINE]. Available at: http://www. synergos.org/knowledge/o2/abcdoverview. htm . [Last Accessed 26 August 2014]. Flores, L (2012). What is social construction? [ONLINE] Available at: http://oakes. ucsc. edu/academics/Core %20Course/oakes-core-awards-2012/laura-flores. hypertext mark-up language .\r\n[Last Accessed 26 August 2014]. Hampton, C and Heaven C (n. d. ). Section 2. Understanding and Describing the Community. [ONLINE] Available at: http://ctb. ku. edu/en/ta ble-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-a nd-resources/describe-the-community/main . [Last Accessed 26 August 2014]. Simmons staff. (n. d. ). Theories Used in Social Work Practice. [ONLINE] Available at: http://socialwork.simmons. edu/theories-used-social-work-practice/ . [Last Accessed 26 August 2014]. Steedman, P. (2000).\r\nOn the relations between seeing, interpreting and knowing. London: Sage. Suttles G, D. (1972). The social construction of communities. maiden ed. Illinois: University of Chicago Press. Vance S. C. (1989). Social construction theory: problems in the history of sexuality. 1st ed. Amsterdam: An Dekker. 8 Varien M, D Potter, M. J, (2008). The Social Construction of Communities: Agency, Structure, and Identity in the Prehispanic south-west (Archaeology in Society). 1st Ed. New York: Rowman and Littlefield publishers.\r\n'