Oscar “Zeta” Acosta Essay

AbstractThe radical that I wrote dialogue ab prohibited Oscar Zeta Acosta and his impact on the Chicano federation. In the leading contri scarcelyion I talk ab bring out how Acosta was an attorney for the Chicano movement and generated controversy. In the leaders contri merelyion region I talk how Acosta addressed political, social, and educational in retributiveices against Chicanos. Acosta apply his time and craft to help the Chicano movement.He contributed by 2 of his books that be a major part of the Chicano literacy renaissance. He besides clashed with the Judicial system a lot of times for reasons that he thought were right. In the section others perspectives I talked round how he was scrutinized by many people but was still recognized through his significance in the Chicano movement.Leaders scopeOscar Zeta Acosta was born in El Paso, Texas on April 8, 1935. A little after he turned phoebe bird he and his family moved to Californias San Joaquin Valley because his family couldnt impart a living during the Depression. His parents started formulate as migrant field workers. Acostas father was different from other people. He had a heating plant for competition he had to compete with people more then(prenominal) any topic. When Acosta was little his father would always make him argue with him. As he said in his book Oscar Zeta Acosta The Uncollected Works I cipher that is where I became as nasty as I am. (5).When Acosta went to high school he wasnt nonpareil of the average Chicanos going to school. He became involved in sports and music he was also president of his class. He got a scholarship for music at the University of Southern California. But he decided not to go. after(prenominal) finishing high school, Acosta joined the U.S. Air Force. Acosta then worked his way through college, becoming the first particle of his family to graduate. Acosta attended night classes at San Francisco Law School and passed the California Bar exam in 1 966 on his second try. (Oscar Zeta Acosta The Uncollected works)In 1967, Acosta began working as an antipoverty attorney for the East Legal Aid hostelry in Oakland, California. Then he moved to East Los Angeles, where he joined the Chicano Movement and generated controversy as an activist attorney during the years 1968-1973. But his activities began in Oakland but it was in East Los Angeles where he gained notoriety. He admited various Chicano protest groups and activists such as the Saint Basil 21 and Rodolfo Corky Gonzalez. As an attorney, he figured prominently in heavy cases which addressed political, social, and educational injustices against Chicanos. Acosta is also a well know author of two most important novels of the Chicano Protest Movement. An Autobiography of a Brown overawe (1972), and The tumult of the Cockroach People (1973) .Acostas characteristics involve him beingness savage, nasty, not giving up nor letting any integrity out him down as he said in his novel The Autobiography of a Brown cow I dont give a shit what other people have to conjecture more or less me(130). I believe that all of these characteristics has made him, become who he was. Because he didnt handle what others thought nearly him, he kept on going when amours got hard .Acostas father had to do a lot with him becoming ilk this, because Acostas father would push Acosta to become give way then anyone else made him become the nasty interior person he was. He would never show his emotions and never really gear up his true identity because Acostas father would always push him to do outside activities, and he didnt have that extra time to spend it with the other Chicanos out on the block. It was until by and by on working as a Legal Aid and saw the Chicanos rioting and walking out for causes he didnt know existed. Leaders ContributionOscar Zeta Acosta contributed to the Chicano friendship through two novels that he wrote. Those two novels were a literary contributi on to the Chicano community and movement. He used his profession as an attorney to defend Mexican/ Chicano walk outs for better education.Acosta demonstrated his contribution through joining the Chicano movement. He used his profession as an attorney to defend various Chicano protest groups and activists such as the Saint Basil 21 which was The Catholics for la Raza the coalition in an ill-fated protest at St. Basils on Christmas Eve, 1969 and also the Rodolfo Corky Gonzalez where he led a Chicano contingent to the Poor Peoples March on Washington D.C and issued a plan of the Barrio which demanded better housing, education and restitution of pueblo lands. Acosta figured prominently in legal cases which addressed political, social, and educational injustices against Chicanos.He frequently clashed with the judicial system, winning ardent supporters as well as making political enemies. He also contributed two novels that he wrote called Autobiography of a Brown Buffalo (1972), and The Revolt of the Cockroach People (1973) . Those were two novels that were highly acclaimed as major contributions to the Chicano literary renaissance. Acosta was a particle accelerator for change because he contributed his time and profession to the Chicano Movement.Acosta defended his community and race and he also took cases that defended Chicano education, and Chicano rights. He contributed to the Chicano literary renaissance. He is nearone that may not be well known to anyone because no one talks about him now but during the Chicano movement he was a catalyst for change because he helped the Chicano community be what it is today by not attaining the injustices they had in the education and in the living of the Chicano community.Other PerspectivesOscar Zeta Acosta is a controversial Chicano author, activist and attorney whose work focuses on ethnicity and ways that people of Mexican ancestry in the United States forge an awareness of themselves and how they get treated by other people.Even though Acosta one-time(prenominal) contradicts himself he is still considered by a few a real great person and activist. The website space-reflection symmetry Justicia y Libertad said that Acosta was A gifted writer and storyteller, an activist, a civil rights attorney, and is considered the Malcolm X of the Chicano/a community. Also in the article called Oscar Zeta Acosta One of Gods own prototypes he said Oscar was a legendary, compelling figure in Chicano history his remains in the shadows of the general American culture ( p.1). thither is one thing was for sure that most Chicana would say that he was a feminist and grouse (Bandido 115) . roughly Chicanas even dislike the way he talks about women in his book. He talks about women as if they were objects and he also talks about them in a vulgar way in the books by calling them bitches of hoers. He also talks in a very feminist way, when you pack his books you can notice how he mentions or trys to lower the femi nine perspective and the learning ability of a women. ConclusionBased on the research I have conducted it is my view that Oscar Zeta Acosta was a cardinal component in the Chicano movement because of the role he took by defending the Chicano community when no one would defend them, and especially because Acosta took his profession and his time to defend them. His work affected my emotional state because it showed me that in life you have to pursue your goals to achieve them. Even though it might be tough there reachable.What surprise me about Acosta was his language in his books because I thought an attorney would not talk or especially write a book with vulgar and derogatory language. Another thing that also surprised me about Acosta was that he was a feminist I believed that someone that would defend people like the Chicano community because of the injustices they are facing in society would discriminate other people.Acostas importance during his lifetime was that he was an me aty part in fixing the Chicano education and living in the Anglo world.ReflectionLeader Selection.I am rejoiced with my catalyst for change choice Oscar Zeta Acosta. I learned more about the Chicano education injustices and also about the Chicano movement. Even tough there where parts that I wasnt pleased about hearing like on how he was a feminist and how vulgar he talked about women in his books and how he just thought they were objects. I still erect my catalyst for change interesting like on how he wasnt like the rest of the Chicanos while he was growing up, he was like an noncitizen to his own race.Methodology. At first it was difficult to find books that Acosta has written or books that talk about him, because every book store I went to said they did not have them but they could always order them but it would take about to two weeks and when I would say no thank you ill try some where else they would look at me if I was crazy. At the end I ended up going to the downtown pub lic library and I was luck there was only one copy of the books. Maybe succeeding(a) time what I would do differently is choose a person that has sources that are available everywhere.I believe that I did pace my self with interlingual rendition the books and writing the composition. My time management was effective at times, because there was times I go carried away doing other things but I would still do my paper even though at times I would have to sleep late.Critical interpretation. Reading the sources was some what difficult because of the language and sometimes the metaphors he used. What I learned about the whole allegeing concept is that it is going to be very useful in college and that you have to learn how to pace yourself when you read also that you have to skim the book, also having a dictionary in hand would be very useful to.Note victorious did become easier as I worked along. I found note taking very useful since the books I was reading were not mine so I couldn t set off the important information that I would be using for my research paper. I found the note taking system very useful, probably the other useful thing that would of helped me would have been if the books were mine because I wouldnt have speed threw the books to get them in by their due date.Writing. In writing my research paper the difficulty I faced was not knowing how to get my point across I found that difficult to do because everyone that read my research paper did not know who Oscar Zeta Acosta was. Probably the one thing that would of been useful was choosing a person that people knew at least the name to. The paper we got with the prompt and the operating instructions on what we had to answer helped a lot because while I was writing my paper I was flavour back to see if I answered the prompt and followed the instructions and criteria. The skills that I believe that I need to work on is on my writing and how I try to get my point across because I found that hard to do. The skill that I believe that I was getting better at was knowing how to paraphrase.Experience. I did enjoy working on this project alone because I worked on it at my own pace, but I do enjoy working with others. I believe this research paper would have been better in group because you dont have top rush threw books because everyone can read a book, also because everyone has their own style of writing and looks at the prompts differently so it would have been easier because everyone could have contributed through their opinions and ideas and could have answered the prompt more efficiently.I believe that the most interesting part of this research paper was getting to know everything that your catalyst for change did, because I just knew a couple of thins that Acosta did like being a lawyer and defending the Chicano community, but I didnt know or have a clue everything else he did and how he acted and how he was a feminist. I believe that the most difficult thing about the research p aper was the paper itself, because everything was just new to me because I have ever used MLA format before.